Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Traditions of the Nacerima

     While reading through Horace Miner’s article, Body Ritual of the Nacerima, five descriptive words that came to mind had largely to do with tradition.

Ritualistic -

     Rituals seemed to be part of everyday life. It was what kept the Nacerima people strong in their pursuits to try and adjust their bodies which they considered ugly. No matter whether one was rich or poor, at least one shrine would be mounted in every person’s household. Their rituals would usually be done alone as opposed to an entire family as a unit. This word best suited their ideals and beliefs.

Masochistic -

     The one profound habit in the entire article was how the Nacerima people became prone to torture and discomfort. Many of the rituals included one way or form of masochism. For example, medicine men would jab an awl into exposed nerves. There was also daily rituals for men in which they would be scrapped and lacerated on the surface of their face with sharp tools. For women, they would bake their heads in small ovens for an hour or so four times a year during the lunar months. This is just a small portion of the tortures that were not only prone to happen but also accepted and celebrated. 

Ceremonial - 

     As opposed to rituals, ceremonies were held in special temples that were not so common to everyday life. The temple, known as latipso, was the place where the sick traveled to get cured. These ceremonies proved to be shocking even for the Nacerima people. For example, a man would normally never show his excretory act to anyone, especially his wife, but maidens of the temple would be present while he would have to excrete into a vessel. Women would be subjected to manipulation and scrutiny for their naked bodies. Every morning, a maiden vestal would awaken their clients to discomfort and torture, forcing them to eat substances and jabbing treated needles into their flesh. Although this would hardly cure the client, people still held a strong faith in these ceremonies. 

Oral - 

     The Nacerima people had a large fascination with the mouth. They believed that if rituals were not conducted for the mouth, their teeth would fall, their gums would bleed, and their jaws would shrink. There were holy-mouth-men that would perform mouth rites where they would insert small amount of hog hairs along with magical powders. These mouth men would also have tools that would seemingly torture the client. The purpose was to create holes in their teeth to put magical materials. There were also ritual ablution for children in order to improve moral fiber. The word best described the Nacerima people’s ideals and fascination with the mouth.  

Economic -

     I chose this word to describe how the Nacerima people actually had a very big understanding in commerce. There was a bunch of trading and exchange for goods and services. Guardians of the temples would expect gifts from clients before and after the ceremonies would take place. Medicine men required substantial gifts after they provided ingredients for their clients, which would then be taken to an herbalist who would also require a gift for their part in retrieving these ingredients. Women with large mammary developments would be able to make a lucrative living simply by traveling from city to city to exhibit their breasts. 



PART B

     As an American, the choice of words I used in Part A seemed rather violent and primal. I was completely unaware of the fact that Horace Miner was describing Americans. However, on second thought, I feel like any foreigner who comes into the American culture can have such a view that can seem quite violent to them. It is true that many of us have a standard to try and alter ourselves to seem beautiful to one another. It really opened up my eyes as to what one can view our culture as. 

      I can completely agree that my choice words exhibited some type of ethnocentrism. I completely judged the culture based on my culture and made it seem as if I were observing a primal tribe. Out of the words I chose, the ones I felt were unbiased were: economic, ritualistic, and ceremonial. I feel like those three words can describe almost any other culture around the world. I feel like rituals and ceremonies are a factor that humans seek, whether it is a daily routine or a sacrifice of an animal. Economy is also extremely universal and known throughout every part of the world. The words I believe were biased were: Oral and Masochistic. Those words definitely exude a sense of primal violence that others may not agree with. Since it was something I could not understand, I put a negative connotation to my description. 

     For the two words that I believe were biased, I simply could have said something more unbiased like, “body-conscious” and, “mouth-related” to try and steer away from any negative connotations. 

     After being completely surprised, I concluded that one must really be cautious of the words they use to describe other cultures. Our own views and standards can unconsciously seep into our minds when we think we are ready to be objective. I believe that it is possible to avoid personal cultural bias, but only if more than one person were reviewing and editing the observations. 

5 comments:

  1. You've chose great words to describe the Nacerima people. In particular I appreciated your use of the word "Masochistic." I chose this word myself as it seemed that they appeared to engage enthusiastically in ritualistic torture of their bodies to achieve benefits that appeared to be primarily external. You've also made an important distinction between ritual and ceremony with your use of the word "Ceremonial." The Nacerima engaged in their daily rituals within the confines of their homes, but went to great lengths/expenses to take part in ceremonies that took place in their temples. Your point that what they do takes faith was very apt.

    Thanks,
    Marc

    ReplyDelete
  2. Five submissions noted and points awarded. Full comments and score will be posted after Part B is submitted.

    ReplyDelete
  3. First of all, I love the background of your blog!

    "As an American, the choice of words I used in Part A seemed rather violent and primal. "

    But does that mean your choice of descriptions were inaccurate? Good discussion on this, but does the awareness that Minor was describing the American culture change the way you would describe them? Might not that feeling be ethnocentric itself, not wanting to describe your own culture in a negative way?

    "I completely judged the culture based on my culture and made it seem as if I were observing a primal tribe."

    And that word "primal" is key here. "Primal" is a comparative word, not just descriptive. To use it, you must necessarily be comparing one tribe (the "primal" one) to another (a "non-primal" one). If you need two (or more) cultures in order to explain your description, you have crossed the line into ethnocentrism.

    "Oral" is frankly not that biased, unless you are familiar with Freud's work, in which case it may give false impressions to the reader. The only term that struck me as strongly ethnocentric was "masochistic", which is based upon your interpretation of their rituals being more "pain" then "gain" (since "masochism" is usually defined as pain as the goal of a behavior). Now that you understand there is benefit to the pain (health and attractiveness to the opposite sex), can you think of another way of describing this?

    "Our own views and standards can unconsciously seep into our minds when we think we are ready to be objective."

    I don't disagree, but since this is a cultural anthropology class, can we be more specific about the dangers of enthocentrism in this course? How might ethnocentrism negatively impact the conclusions a cultural anthropologist might draw about another culture? Could we consider those conclusions reliable and factual if they started from a place of bias?

    "I believe that it is possible to avoid personal cultural bias, but only if more than one person were reviewing and editing the observations."

    Unfortunately, cultural anthropologists are human and subject to human error. They can strive to avoid bias but it is unrealistic to assume any could actually achieve that level of perceptive perfection.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think you did a very good job on your post and I think that Horace Miner definitely caught us all off guard when we found out he was describing Americans! Also I think you are right when you said that when foreigners who see American culture first hand think that it can be violent but then I also feel that violent can be a harsh word because it can imply that everyone is just out to get you. But other than that you did a great job!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hello!
    First off, let me just say that I love the theme of your blog- it is so beautiful! I really liked the words that you chose to describe the tribe and the descriptions you put alongside them :) I especially liked the part where you noted how some foreigners would probably be shocked to as how Americans act when they first visit America- and I will tell you, I recently had a visitor from Canada come to town for a week and she noted how shocked she was as to how rude and kind of dirty LA folks are lol. I think you did a great job on your first post- it was a very interesting read :)

    -Lucy Rodriguez

    ReplyDelete